Adenomyosis and Uterine Fibr


Creative Commons License

Pecorella G., Morciano P., Medvediev M., Sparic R., Bıyık İ., Aydın G., ...Daha Fazla

DIAGNOSTICS, cilt.16, sa.18, ss.2968-2986, 2026 (SCI-Expanded, Scopus)

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Derleme
  • Cilt numarası: 16 Sayı: 18
  • Basım Tarihi: 2026
  • Doi Numarası: 10.3390/diagnostics16182968
  • Dergi Adı: DIAGNOSTICS
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Academic Search Ultimate (EBSCO), Biomedical Reference Collection: Corporate Edition (EBSCO), Scopus, Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), EMBASE, Directory of Open Access Journals
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.2968-2986
  • Açık Arşiv Koleksiyonu: AVESİS Açık Erişim Koleksiyonu
  • Kütahya Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Adenomyosis and uterine fibroids are among the most common benign uterine disorders in

women of reproductive age and represent major causes of abnormal uterine bleeding, pelvic

pain, and infertility. Despite their distinct histopathological features, they frequently coexist

and share several hormonal and molecular mechanisms, making diagnosis and treatment

challenging. This narrative review examines the current evidence on their epidemiology,

pathophysiology, clinical presentation, imaging characteristics, reproductive impact, and

therapeutic management, with particular attention to the role of imaging in the differential

diagnosis and management of coexisting disease. A non-systematic narrative review of

the literature was conducted using PubMed/MEDLINE and Scopus. Relevant original

studies, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, consensus statements, and clinical guidelines

addressing adenomyosis, uterine fibroids, imaging, fertility, and treatment were considered.

Additional references were identified through manual screening of the bibliographies of

the retrieved articles. Although adenomyosis and uterine fibroids differ in their biological

origin and morphological appearance, they commonly present with overlapping symptoms,

including heavy menstrual bleeding, dysmenorrhea, chronic pelvic pain, and reproductive

dysfunction. Transvaginal ultrasound remains the first-line imaging modality, whereas

magnetic resonance imaging is particularly valuable in complex cases, lesion characteriza-

tion, and preoperative assessment. Accurate imaging phenotyping may help distinguish

isolated from coexisting disease and support individualized medical, surgical, or minimally

invasive treatment planning. A structured imaging-based approach integrated with clinical

findings and reproductive goals may improve disease characterization and support indi-

vidualized management of adenomyosis and uterine fibroids. Further standardization of imaging criteria and validation of emerging diagnostic technologies may improve patient

stratification and treatment selection.